Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 475

United States Customs Court·Decided June 29, 1956·No. Reap. Dec. 8617; Entry No. 21178·Published

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule [476]*476“A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

On the agreed facts I find the proper value of the involved merchandise to be the invoice unit prices.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule [476]*476“A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

On the agreed facts I find the proper value of the involved merchandise to be the invoice unit prices.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 475 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

37 Cust. Ct. 475 (Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.