Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Blakely
This text of 25 So. 2d 585 (Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Blakely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is a companion case to Montgomery Ward Co. Inc., et al. v. Skinner,
But appellants in this case say it should be reversed because of improper argument to the jury by counsel for appellee. We have carefully reviewed that argument as disclosed by the special bill of exceptions and we find no reversible error, if error at all, in such argument.
The judgment herein was for $12,500. For the reasons stated in the Skinner case and for the further reason that these two cases, together with another which is now pending in the lower court, are grounded upon one and the same state of facts, we are of the opinion (Judge McGEHEE and the CHIEF JUSTICE not assenting thereto) that a remittitur should be required herein so as to reduce the judgment to $7,500.
If, therefore, such remittitur is entered the case will be affirmed; otherwise, it will be reversed and remanded for assessment of damages only.
Affirmed, with remittitur. *Page 83
L.A. Smith, Sr., Alexander, and Griffith, JJ., respectfully dissent from the conclusions reached in the controlling opinion for the reasons set out in the dissenting opinions in the case of Montgomery Ward Co., Inc., et al. v. Skinner,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 So. 2d 585, 200 Miss. 81, 1946 Miss. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-ward-co-v-blakely-miss-1946.