Montgomery v. Vinton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Montgomery v. Vinton

37 Vt. 514

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJanuary 15, 1865

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 37 Vt. 514 (Montgomery v. Vinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montgomery v. Vinton, 37 Vt. 514 (Vt. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

Poland, Ch. J.

The petitioner has mistaken the tribunal to Which his application should have been made. This court has no jurisdiction to grant new trials in cases in the county court, except cases which have been tried in the couhty court.

All applications for relief against defaults or non-suits in the county court, must be made in the county court which ordered them. This has been long and repeatedly settled by decisions of this court. Scott v. Stewart, 5 Vt. 57; Adams v. Howard, 14 Vt. 560 ; Beckwith v. Middlesex, 20 Vt. 593 ; Foster v. Austin, 33 Vt, 615.

Petition dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poland, Ch. J.

The petitioner has mistaken the tribunal to Which his application should have been made. This court has no jurisdiction to grant new trials in cases in the county court, except cases which have been tried in the couhty court.

All applications for relief against defaults or non-suits in the county court, must be made in the county court which ordered them. This has been long and repeatedly settled by decisions of this court. Scott v. Stewart, 5 Vt. 57; Adams v. Howard, 14 Vt. 560 ; Beckwith v. Middlesex, 20 Vt. 593 ; Foster v. Austin, 33 Vt, 615.

Petition dismissed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Vt. 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-vinton-vt-1865.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack