Montgomery v. United States

654 F. App'x 635
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 22, 2016·No. No. 16-6484·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Duane Montgomery appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action, denying his motions for entry of default and default judgment, and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court; Montgomery v. United States, No. 5:14-ct-03279-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 7, & Mar. 31, 2016). We deny Montgomery’s motions for transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery v. United States, 654 F. App'x 635 (4th Cir. 2016).

654 F. App'x 635 (Montgomery v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hubbard v. Greenville DSS County
D. South Carolina, 2025