Montgomery v. State

1942 OK CR 152, 131 P.2d 127, 75 Okla. Crim. 299, 1942 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 49
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 18, 1942
DocketNo. A-10226.
StatusPublished

This text of 1942 OK CR 152 (Montgomery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. State, 1942 OK CR 152, 131 P.2d 127, 75 Okla. Crim. 299, 1942 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 49 (Okla. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

JONES, J.

The defendant, L. C. Montgomery, was charged by information filed in the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county with the crime of resisting an executive officer in the performance of his duty, was tried, convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs, and has appeared.

That part of the information which describes the acts of the defendant which are alleged to have been committed is as follows: * * and in resisting the arrest and service of said warrants, the said L. C. Montgomery, did strike, beat, bruise and otherwise maltreat the said J. R. Turner, all of which acts were done by the said defendant, L. C. Montgomery, in the resistance of the said officer in the performance of his official duties ; * *

*300 Several assignments of error are presented by tbe defendant, bnt bis brief is devoted mainly to tbe proposition that tbe evidence is wholly insufficient to sustain tbe conviction.

No brief bas been filed on behalf of tbe state, and at tbe time tbe cause was set for oral argument counsel who* appeared for tbe state informed this court that in their opinion tbe evidence was insufficient to sustain tbe conviction. However, no formal confession of error bas been filed.

The defendant was 50 years of age and engaged in tbe business of buying and selling used furniture and other secondhand goods in Oklahoma City.

Prior to the occasion in question, the officers of Oklahoma City bad made various searches of the place of business operated by tbe defendant looking for stolen merchandise. On some of these trips they bad been successful in finding’ articles which bad been reported to> them as stolen. Tbe defendant bad complained that the officers were searching bis place of business without, a search warrant several times daily and were disturbing bis business and their activities were preventing him from selling bis merchandise.

On tbe morning, of tbe day tbe offense was alleged to have been committed, tbe defendant and bis attorney bad secured a temporary restraining order from tbe district court restraining tbe officers from making a search of tbe defendant’s place of business without a search warrant. About 2 o’clock in tbe afternoon on that day five of tbe officers obtained a search warrant and went to tbe defendant’s place of business. Tbe facts up to this point are undisputed.

J. W. Casady, policeman, testified that he was in another part of tbe building and beard a commotion out *301 on the sidewalk and that when he got out there he saw Mr. Turner (the policeman) throw defendant over his shoulder onto the sidewalk and that he picked the defendant up and put him in the car. He further testified:

“Q. What did Mr. Montgomery say, if he said anything? A. He was screaming for help. He had people around there working for him and he wanted them to help him. Q. Did you see anybody strike him? A. No, sir, I didn’t. Q. And was he the worst beat up man that ever came into the courthouse? A. No, sir. Q. Mr. White here, in his opening statement, said he was the worst beat up man that ever came into the courthouse'— A. X think he had his head skinned where Mr. Turner threw him over his shoulder. I think it skinned his head some.”

J. E. White, policeman, testified:

“A. We went in and looked around his place; and I was standing over there near the telephone and I heard him ask Bob (Turner) if he could use the telephone and Bob told him ‘No’ and Bob said ‘You are under arrest’ and give him them warrants; and he said ‘that is just fine’ and he said ‘you sonsabitches, I want you to' do all you can’ and I walked over by the radiator and Bob' started out to' the car; and that is when I heard them scuffling and I looked around and Bob was leading him around out to' the car; picking him up off the floor. Q. What happened? A. I didn’t run over there but I think Casady helped get him in the car.”

R. M. Ewing, policeman, testified that he was in the rear of the store building and heard a scuffle out on the sidewalk between the defendant and officer Turner. He further testified:

“Q. Did you see anybody hit anybody? A. I think, while scuffling, there was a lick or two passed. * * * Q. Who struck the first blow? A. I couldn’t tell whether both struck, or what. The only thing I saw was just as they started out, and whether Mr. Montgomery in turning accidently hit him with his elbow or arm; but on Mr. *302 Turner’s left side the glass kinder gouged in his mouth, and his glasses hanging by one ear, and Mr. Montgomery kinder turned — well, I don’t know in turning whether he hit him with his fist or elbow. I am inclined to think his elbow. * * * Q. Was his back all skinned up? A. He was pretty well skinned up, but I think it was1 caused by falling on the sidewalk; and if anybody kicked the man, or used their boots on him, I didn’t see it. I didn’t see what took place prior to about six feet back. You know, where the counter goes down, five or six feet back in the store. I did not see what happened from there back in the store. * * * Q. Well, who hit those licks? A. There were some licks passed between him and Mr. Turner. Q. Who hit them? A. Mr. Turner, I think. I don’t think there were over two or three passed. They were pretty close together. Q. And that is the way the old man got down, wasn’t it? A. No, he didn’t go down from those licks. He went to hollering.”

Officer Turner testified that he had a search warrant and two warrants for the arrest of defendant when he and the officers went to his place of business. He further testified:

“Q. Did the defendant, Montgomery, say anything to you? A. I told him I had the warrants and he said ‘That is fine. That is fine. That is just fine.’ And ‘You sonsabitches is making it better all the time.’ And I took ahold of him and said that didn’t make any difference and told him to go on out to the car and wait until they got through looking around and he hit me. * * * Q. What did you do? A. I grabbed him and carried him out of the place and we both fell. He got up and came at me again and I hit him and he came back again and I grabbed him and he went at me again and I threw him kind of over, me as we fell. Q. Then what happened? A. We got him up and put him in the car and put him in the county jail. Mr. Casady and I.”

This is all the testimony of the state.

W. H. Regian testified that he was the deputy court clerk and saw the defendant at the courthouse when he *303 was fixing to make bond. He further testified:

“Q. What was his condition, tell the jury? A. Well, he looked like a freight train had hit him. He was bloody and blood all over him. All over his shoulder and head. Q. Was his shirt torn off? A. It was torn. Not off of him. Q. His side bloody? A. Yes. Q. And body? A. No, I just saw where it was torn. Where his shirt was torn. Q. Did you notice whether or not he was stooped over like he was about to collapse? A. Yes, he was standing in a kinder stooped position. Q. He was in a very bad condition, wasn’t he? A. Looked to me like he should have gone to the hospital.”

L. M.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yates v. State
1941 OK CR 134 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1942 OK CR 152, 131 P.2d 127, 75 Okla. Crim. 299, 1942 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-state-oklacrimapp-1942.