Montgomery v. State of Nevada

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided September 28, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-01061·Unknown

Opinion

3 BOBBY LEE MONTGOMERY, Case No. 2:20-cv-01061-KJD-VCF

4 Plaintiff ORDER

5 v.

6 STATE OF NEVADA et al.,

7 Defendants

8 10 Pro se Plaintiff Bobby Lee Montgomery, a former inmate of the Clark County 11 Detention Center, brings this civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). 12 Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated and has paid the $400 filing fee for a civil action. (ECF 13 No. 1-1). In light of Plaintiff’s non-incarceration and payment of the filing fee, the Court is 14 no longer required to screen this case. See generally 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (the plaintiff is 15 no longer a prisoner within the meaning of the statute); see Olivas v. Nevada ex rel. Dep’t 16 of Corr., 856 F.3d 1281, 1282 (9th Cir. 2017) (holding that “28 U.S.C. § 1915A applies 17 only to claims brought by individuals incarcerated at the time they file their complaints”); 18 see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (recognizing that 19 screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) applies to actions filed in forma pauperis whether 20 or not the plaintiff is incarcerated). This case will now proceed onto the normal litigation 21 track. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// IL CONCLUSION 2 For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that this case will proceed on the normal 3 | litigation track. 4 It is further ordered that Plaintiff must perfect service within ninety (90) days from 5 | the date of this order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 6 7 DATED THIS 28 day of September 2020. ™ Lo 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery v. State of Nevada, (D. Nev. 2020).

Montgomery v. State of Nevada (Montgomery v. State of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olivas v. Nevada Ex Rel. Department of Corrections
856 F.3d 1281 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Lopez v. Smith
203 F.3d 1122 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)