Montgomery v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Montgomery v. State

540 S.W.3d 2

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105263

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 2 (Montgomery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montgomery v. State, 540 S.W.3d 2 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Jacob Montgomery ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The State charged Movant with a total of seven counts: two counts of the class A felony of robbery in the first degree, two counts of the unclassified felony of armed criminal action, one count of the class B felony of burglary in the first degree, and two counts of the class D felony of unlawful use of a weapon. Movant agreed to plead guilty to all counts. The trial court sentenced Movant to concurrent sentences of thirteen years for robbery, armed criminal action, burglary, and unlawful use of a weapon, and four years for unlawful use of a weapon. The motion court denied Movant's motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the motion court's judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Jacob Montgomery ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The State charged Movant with a total of seven counts: two counts of the class A felony of robbery in the first degree, two counts of the unclassified felony of armed criminal action, one count of the class B felony of burglary in the first degree, and two counts of the class D felony of unlawful use of a weapon. Movant agreed to plead guilty to all counts. The trial court sentenced Movant to concurrent sentences of thirteen years for robbery, armed criminal action, burglary, and unlawful use of a weapon, and four years for unlawful use of a weapon. The motion court denied Movant's motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the motion court's judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-state-moctapp-2018.