Montgomery v. State

74 S.E. 285, 10 Ga. App. 801, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 699
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 19, 1912
Docket3956
StatusPublished

This text of 74 S.E. 285 (Montgomery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. State, 74 S.E. 285, 10 Ga. App. 801, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 699 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Russell, J.

The statement of the judge, in directing a verdict for two of three defendants jointly indicted, that he would express no opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the third defendant (the plaintiff in error here)., is not subject to criticism as being expressive of an opinion as to the defendant’s guilt, nor prejudicial to his right to a fair trial. The trial was free from error, and the evidence fully authorized the conviction of the offense of voluntary manslaughter.

Judgment affirmed.

Conviction of manslaughter; from Colquitt superior court— Judge Thomas. Deeejnber 16, 1911. W. F. Way, W. A. Covington, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wilkes, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 S.E. 285, 10 Ga. App. 801, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-state-gactapp-1912.