Montgomery v. State
This text of 74 S.E. 285 (Montgomery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The statement of the judge, in directing a verdict for two of three defendants jointly indicted, that he would express no opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the third defendant (the plaintiff in error here)., is not subject to criticism as being expressive of an opinion as to the defendant’s guilt, nor prejudicial to his right to a fair trial. The trial was free from error, and the evidence fully authorized the conviction of the offense of voluntary manslaughter.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 S.E. 285, 10 Ga. App. 801, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-state-gactapp-1912.