Montgomery v. State

564 So. 2d 604, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5624, 1990 WL 107800
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1990·No. No. 89-770·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant Steve Montgomery from final judgments of conviction and sentences for (1) sexual battery by one eighteen years of age on one under twelve years of age [§ 794.011(2), Fla.Stat. (1987)], (2) attempted sexual battery by one eighteen years of age on one under twelve years of age [§ 794.011(2), Fla.Stat. (1987)], and (3) lewd and lascivious assault [§ 800.04, Fla.Stat. (1987) ]. The defendant raises one point on appeal, namely, that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting in evidence at trial that the defendant had sexually assaulted the victim’s sister. Because (a) the defendant was the stepfather of both the victim and the victim’s sister, and (b) the sexual assaults against both children occurred within a familial context, we conclude that the complained-of evidence was admissible to corroborate the victim’s testimony at trial, and, accordingly, no reversible error is presented by this point. Beasley v. State, 518 So.2d 917 (Fla.1988); Heuring v. State, 513 So.2d 122 (Fla.1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery v. State, 564 So. 2d 604, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5624, 1990 WL 107800 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

564 So. 2d 604 (Montgomery v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adkins v. State
605 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Wilkerson v. State
583 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Towbridge v. State
564 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)