Montgomery v. Smith
182 S.E.2d 316, 227 Ga. 601, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 788
Opinion
The appellant here complains of the denial of a petition for the writ of habeas corpus in which he alleged that the charge on alibi in his criminal trial deprived him of due process of law. As to this he averred that it placed an unwarranted burden of proof upon him, thus denying him the presumption of innocence and misleading and confusing the jury. This complaint is made for the first time in the habeas corpus petition.
This appeal cannot be sustained. Shoemake v. Whitlock, 226 Ga. 771 (177 SE2d 677).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Montgomery v. Smith, 182 S.E.2d 316, 227 Ga. 601, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 788 (Ga. 1971).
182 S.E.2d 316 (Montgomery v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parrish v. Hopper
233 S.E.2d 161 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)