Montgomery v. Robinson
This text of 49 Cal. 258 (Montgomery v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was not error to overrule the objection -to the sheriff’s [260]*260deed. The judgment and execution were proved independently of the deed, and the deed itself recites enough to show the authority of the officer—that the sale was made under and by virtue of an execution issued upon a judgment of the County Court, in an action wherein A. Montgomery was plaintiff, and Thomas Long defendant. These facts bring the case within the rule laid down in Clark v. Sawyer, 48 Cal. 133. (See also Blood v. Light, 38 Cal. 657.)
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Chief Justice Wallace, did not express an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 Cal. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-robinson-cal-1874.