Montgomery v. Montgomery

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Montgomery v. Montgomery

110 So. 2d 39, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3134

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1959·No. No. 881·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the chancellor is hereby affirmed.

This order is without prejudice to the wife to apply to the chancellor for a reconsideration of the order hereby affirmed in the light of the contention that she has refrained from the use of alcohol since. December, 1956. If this fact is established to the chancellor’s satisfaction and if the mother in other respects is qualified to have the custody of said child, on reconsideration, he may desire to alter the custodial order in the light of present conditions and what is then to the best interest of the minor child.

KANNER, C. J., SHANNON, J., and DREW, E. HARRIS, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the chancellor is hereby affirmed.

This order is without prejudice to the wife to apply to the chancellor for a reconsideration of the order hereby affirmed in the light of the contention that she has refrained from the use of alcohol since. December, 1956. If this fact is established to the chancellor’s satisfaction and if the mother in other respects is qualified to have the custody of said child, on reconsideration, he may desire to alter the custodial order in the light of present conditions and what is then to the best interest of the minor child.

KANNER, C. J., SHANNON, J., and DREW, E. HARRIS, Associate Judge, concur.

Montgomery v. Montgomery, 110 So. 2d 39, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

110 So. 2d 39 (Montgomery v. Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related