Montgomery v. Mohawk Coach Lines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Montgomery v. Mohawk Coach Lines

94 A.D.2d 632, 462 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18035

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A.D.2d 632 (Montgomery v. Mohawk Coach Lines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montgomery v. Mohawk Coach Lines, 94 A.D.2d 632, 462 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (A. Klein, J.), entered on November 25, 1981, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff James Montgomery and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only awarded to said plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless plaintiff James Montgomery, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $100,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff James Montgomery so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (A. Klein, J.), entered on November 25, 1981, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff James Montgomery and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only awarded to said plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless plaintiff James Montgomery, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $100,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff James Montgomery so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.2d 632, 462 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-mohawk-coach-lines-nyappdiv-1983.