Montgomery v. Lambert
456 So. 2d 1331, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2182, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15331
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 1984·No. No. 83-2302·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Subsequent to our relinquishment of jurisdiction and prior to oral argument, the trial court reinstated the amended complaint which we find is related to the counterclaim herein. Thus, the order disposing of the counterclaim is no longer an appeala-ble final order. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla.1974). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to refile after a final judgment has been rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Montgomery v. Lambert, 456 So. 2d 1331, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2182, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15331 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
456 So. 2d 1331 (Montgomery v. Lambert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker-Seaman v. Garwood
456 So. 2d 1331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)