Montgomery v. Lambert

456 So. 2d 1331, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2182, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15331
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1984
DocketNo. 83-2302
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 456 So. 2d 1331 (Montgomery v. Lambert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. Lambert, 456 So. 2d 1331, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2182, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15331 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Subsequent to our relinquishment of jurisdiction and prior to oral argument, the trial court reinstated the amended complaint which we find is related to the counterclaim herein. Thus, the order disposing of the counterclaim is no longer an appeala-ble final order. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla.1974). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to refile after a final judgment has been rendered.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker-Seaman v. Garwood
456 So. 2d 1331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 So. 2d 1331, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2182, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-lambert-fladistctapp-1984.