Montgomery v. Hasbrouck

New York Supreme Court

Montgomery v. Hasbrouck

3 Johns. 538

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1808

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 3 Johns. 538 (Montgomery v. Hasbrouck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montgomery v. Hasbrouck, 3 Johns. 538 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where the process is not bailable, or the cause of action is not specified in the writ, the plaintiff may join any number of defendants in the writ, and declare against them severally. There can be no inconvenience in this practice. If either of the defendants is not declared against, and he wishes to get rid of the action, he must proceed by obtaining a rule against the plaintiff to declare against him, or be nonsuited.

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Where the process is not bailable, or the cause of action is not specified in the writ, the plaintiff may join any number of defendants in the writ, and declare against them severally. There can be no inconvenience in this practice. If either of the defendants is not declared against, and he wishes to get rid of the action, he must proceed by obtaining a rule against the plaintiff to declare against him, or be nonsuited.

Rule refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Johns. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-hasbrouck-nysupct-1808.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack