Montgomery v. Harson
3 S.C.L. 480
This text of 3 S.C.L. 480 (Montgomery v. Harson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Montgomery v. Harson, 3 S.C.L. 480 (S.C. 1805).
Opinions
Costs follow the judgment; but, as the debt was satisfied before judgment, the plaintiff is not intitled to judgment for the costs alone.The receipt of the money, in full satisfaction of the debt, discharges the defendant, and operates as a release of the action; and, consequently, each party must bear his own expenses of the suit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 S.C.L. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-harson-sc-1805.