Montgomery v. Hardy Engineering & Construction Co.

116 S.E.2d 650, 102 Ga. App. 480, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 658
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 29, 1960·No. 38435·Published

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

In an action by a subcontractor against a general contractor to recover damages for an alleged breach of the subcontract by the general contractor the petition is not subject to special demurrer on the ground that a copy of the general contract is not attached to the petition (the general contract being made a part of the subcontract by reference) where the petition alleges that the plaintiff subcontractor had never received a copy of the general contract and that he was unable to obtain a copy from the attorney for -the defendant. Farr v. McCook, 95 Ga. App. 749 (98 S. E. 2d 584); Glover v. Maddox, 98 Ga. App. 548 (106 S. E. 2d 288); Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Fine, 56 Ga. App. 729, 736 (194 S. E. 58); Roadway Exp. v. Jackson, 77 Ga. App. 341 (4) (48 S. E. 2d 691). The court erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition and in dismissing the action.

Judgment reversed.

Nichols, J., concurs. Bell, J., concurs in the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery v. Hardy Engineering & Construction Co., 116 S.E.2d 650, 102 Ga. App. 480, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 658 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960).

116 S.E.2d 650 (Montgomery v. Hardy Engineering & Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glover v. Maddox
106 S.E.2d 288 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Farr v. McCook
98 S.E.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Roadway Express Inc. v. Jackson
48 S.E.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Fine
194 S.E. 58 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)