Montgomery v. Duffey

145 So. 420, 226 Ala. 26, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 457
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 12, 1933
Docket5 Div. 125.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 145 So. 420 (Montgomery v. Duffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. Duffey, 145 So. 420, 226 Ala. 26, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 457 (Ala. 1933).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The suit was by a bill in equity and in the name of the guardian rather than in the name of the ward by the guardian. Eor this reason the circuit court was without jurisdiction to bind the ward. Wallace v. Montgomery, Superintendent of Banks (Ala. Sup.) 145 So. 419. 1 This results in a reversal of the judgment and remandment of the cause for proper amendment if the parties are so advised.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
1

Ante, p. 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Cabaniss
178 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
White v. Hale
175 So. 288 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 So. 420, 226 Ala. 26, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-duffey-ala-1933.