Montgomery v. Drewry

134 So. 914, 223 Ala. 703
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 21, 1931·No. 6 Div. 803.·Published

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

Under the authority of Town Council of Guntersville v. Henry, 222 Ala. 474, 133 So. 5, which was rested upon Coons v. Isbell, 222 Ala. 409, 132 So. 891, where the question here involved was fully discussed, petitioner is entitled to the relief he seeks to compel the holding of a municipal election for Haleyville.

There is nothing in the present case which differentiates it from those above noted, and under these authorities, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings in harmony with these views.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery v. Drewry, 134 So. 914, 223 Ala. 703 (Ala. 1931).

134 So. 914 (Montgomery v. Drewry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town Council of Guntersville v. Henry
133 So. 5 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Coons v. Isbell
132 So. 891 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)