Montgomery v. Drewry
This text of 134 So. 914 (Montgomery v. Drewry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the authority of Town Council of Guntersville v. Henry, 222 Ala. 474, 133 So. 5, which was rested upon Coons v. Isbell, 222 Ala. 409, 132 So. 891, where the question here involved was fully discussed, petitioner is entitled to the relief he seeks to compel the holding of a municipal election for Haleyville.
There is nothing in the present case which differentiates it from those above noted, and under these authorities, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings in harmony with these views.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 So. 914, 223 Ala. 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-drewry-ala-1931.