Montgomery v. Drewry

134 So. 914, 223 Ala. 703
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 21, 1931
Docket6 Div. 803.
StatusPublished

This text of 134 So. 914 (Montgomery v. Drewry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. Drewry, 134 So. 914, 223 Ala. 703 (Ala. 1931).

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

Under the authority of Town Council of Guntersville v. Henry, 222 Ala. 474, 133 So. 5, which was rested upon Coons v. Isbell, 222 Ala. 409, 132 So. 891, where the question here involved was fully discussed, petitioner is entitled to the relief he seeks to compel the holding of a municipal election for Haleyville.

There is nothing in the present case which differentiates it from those above noted, and under these authorities, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings in harmony with these views.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town Council of Guntersville v. Henry
133 So. 5 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Coons v. Isbell
132 So. 891 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 So. 914, 223 Ala. 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-drewry-ala-1931.