Montgomery v. Circuit Judge

1 McGrath 469, 100 McGrath 436
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 22, 1894
DocketNo. 14063½
StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 469 (Montgomery v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 469, 100 McGrath 436 (Mich. 1894).

Opinion

To compel respondent to set aside an order quashing contempt proceedings, and to proceed with the hearing of the question of contempt.

[472]*472Granted May 22, 1894, with costs against respondent in the contempt proceeding.

A former judge granted the order to show, cause in the contempt proceedings. A motion to quash was made after his retirement, and his successor granted the motion. The question was, whether there was enough before the judge granting the order to show cause, to warrant the citation. It was suggested, that the court will not by mandamus review the decision of the trial judge in contempt proceedings.

Held, that such is the rule in any caase where the determination of the judge calls for the exercise of judgment in determining the fact; but where the question which the judge determines is, whether there is jurisdiction to proceed to try the question of fact, his ruling is open to review, and as mandamus is the only adequate remedy, it may properly be employed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 McGrath 469, 100 McGrath 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-circuit-judge-mich-1894.