Montgomery v. Burns

394 U.S. 848, 89 S. Ct. 1623, 23 L. Ed. 2d 31, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1708
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 21, 1969
Docket438
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 394 U.S. 848 (Montgomery v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. Burns, 394 U.S. 848, 89 S. Ct. 1623, 23 L. Ed. 2d 31, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1708 (1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of The Chief Justice in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivera v. Dunn
329 F. Supp. 554 (D. Connecticut, 1971)
Barnett v. Lindsay
319 F. Supp. 610 (D. Utah, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 U.S. 848, 89 S. Ct. 1623, 23 L. Ed. 2d 31, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-burns-scotus-1969.