Montgomery v. Burns

394 U.S. 848, 89 S. Ct. 1623, 23 L. Ed. 2d 31, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1708
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 21, 1969·No. 438·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of The Chief Justice in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery v. Burns, 394 U.S. 848, 89 S. Ct. 1623, 23 L. Ed. 2d 31, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1708 (1969).

394 U.S. 848 (Montgomery v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. Dunn
329 F. Supp. 554 (D. Connecticut, 1971)
Barnett v. Lindsay
319 F. Supp. 610 (D. Utah, 1970)