Montgomery v. Brittin
This text of 23 Ark. 322 (Montgomery v. Brittin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The questions presented in this case were decided in Brearl/y vs. Peay, Bee., at the present term, which followed previous adjudications of the court.
The judgment sought to be revived by the scire facias was rendered 29th April, 1850. Upon the trial of the issue to the plea of payment, no actual payment was proven, and sufficient time for the common law presumption of payment to attach, had not elapsed when the scire facias was sued out. The plea of the statute oi limitation was inappropriate.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Ark. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-brittin-ark-1861.