Montgomery v. Bowen

93 S.E. 111, 20 Ga. App. 493, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 946
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 5, 1917
Docket8489
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 93 S.E. 111 (Montgomery v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. Bowen, 93 S.E. 111, 20 Ga. App. 493, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 946 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. A motion to vacate and set aside a verdict and judgment, made at the term of the court at which' they were rendered, is addressed to the sound legal discretion of the court; and that discretion, unless manifestly abused, will not be controlled. Lambert v. Smith, 57 Ga. 25; Moore v. Kelly & Jones Co., 109 Ga. 798 (35 S. E. 168).

2. There was an acute conflict in the evidence, submitted in the form of affidavits, as to whether the movant and his counsel had been guilty of such laches as would prevent the setting aside of the verdict and judgment. -Upon these questions of fact involved the trial judge was the trior, and his finding thereon is conclusive. It is not made to appear that he abused his discretion in granting the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Methodist Episcopal Church, South Inc. v. Decell
5 S.E.2d 66 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Taylor v. Keown
137 S.E. 907 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Golightly v. Line
121 S.E. 878 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 111, 20 Ga. App. 493, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-bowen-gactapp-1917.