Montgomery v. Berry

Fourth Circuit

Montgomery v. Berry

164 F. App'x 368

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2006·No. No. 05-7641·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sherman Clayton Montgomery appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Montgomery v. Berry, No. CA-04-210 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sherman Clayton Montgomery appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Montgomery v. Berry, No. CA-04-210 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Montgomery v. Berry, 164 F. App'x 368 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 368 (Montgomery v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related