Montgomery Traction Co. v. Montgomery Amusement Co.
This text of 140 F. 988 (Montgomery Traction Co. v. Montgomery Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Without examining this ease now as to its merits, a majority of the court have concluded that it is not advisable or proper to interfere with the discretion of the trial court in the granting of the temporary injunction. Adhering to the construction we have heretofore given the act allowing appeals in such cases, we affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court. Lehman v. Graham, 135 Fed. 39, 67 C. C. A. 513; Railroad Commission v. J. Rosenbaum Grain Co., 130 Fed. 110, 64 C. C. A. 444; Kerr v. New Orleans, 126 Fed. 920, 61 C. C. A. 450; Massie v. Buck, 128 Fed. 27, 62 C. C. A. 535.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 F. 988, 72 C.C.A. 682, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-traction-co-v-montgomery-amusement-co-ca5-1905.