Montgomery Traction Co. v. Montgomery Amusement Co.

Fifth Circuit

Montgomery Traction Co. v. Montgomery Amusement Co.

140 F. 988, 72 C.C.A. 682, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3979

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 30, 1905·No. No. 1,508·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without examining this ease now as to its merits, a majority of the court have concluded that it is not advisable or proper to interfere with the discretion of the trial court in the granting of the temporary injunction. Adhering to the construction we have heretofore given the act allowing appeals in such cases, we affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court. Lehman v. Graham, 135 Fed. 39, 67 C. C. A. 513; Railroad Commission v. J. Rosenbaum Grain Co., 130 Fed. 110, 64 C. C. A. 444; Kerr v. New Orleans, 126 Fed. 920, 61 C. C. A. 450; Massie v. Buck, 128 Fed. 27, 62 C. C. A. 535.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Without examining this ease now as to its merits, a majority of the court have concluded that it is not advisable or proper to interfere with the discretion of the trial court in the granting of the temporary injunction. Adhering to the construction we have heretofore given the act allowing appeals in such cases, we affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court. Lehman v. Graham, 135 Fed. 39, 67 C. C. A. 513; Railroad Commission v. J. Rosenbaum Grain Co., 130 Fed. 110, 64 C. C. A. 444; Kerr v. New Orleans, 126 Fed. 920, 61 C. C. A. 450; Massie v. Buck, 128 Fed. 27, 62 C. C. A. 535.

Montgomery Traction Co. v. Montgomery Amusement Co., 140 F. 988, 72 C.C.A. 682, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3979 (5th Cir. 1905).

Pincite

140 F. 988 (Montgomery Traction Co. v. Montgomery Amusement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related