Montgomery, Shelton Wade

CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 2015
DocketWR-83,375-01
StatusPublished

This text of Montgomery, Shelton Wade (Montgomery, Shelton Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery, Shelton Wade, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

2fi^>1Vd DI E NO. WR-83,375-01 CAUSE NO. 4762A F SEP0..?fli5 SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS VIVIAN LONG, CLERK u

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 100™ DISTRICT COURT

VS. IN AND FOR

SHELTON WADE MONTGOMERY, CARSON COUNTY, TEXAS EX PARTE

ORDER

The court, after reviewing the affidavit of defense counsel Paul Herrmann, finds that the representation

of the defendant was not deficient. Any failure to call witnesses was a legitimate trial strategy choice.

Stuart M. Messer, District Judge Presiding

C011PTnfC£,VEDW C°WT0FCTO,Wu;pB(ts SEP OS 2015

Abe!Acosia,Ctert,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Montgomery, Shelton Wade, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-shelton-wade-tex-2015.