MONTGOMERY, MITCHELL v. ARTUS, DALE

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 2014
DocketKAH 12-00123
StatusPublished

This text of MONTGOMERY, MITCHELL v. ARTUS, DALE (MONTGOMERY, MITCHELL v. ARTUS, DALE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MONTGOMERY, MITCHELL v. ARTUS, DALE, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

118 KAH 12-00123 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. MITCHELL MONTGOMERY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DALE ARTUS, SUPERINTENDENT, GOWANDA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P. Buscaglia, A.J.), entered November 29, 2011 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that he was improperly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender on his 1998 conviction of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]). We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied the petition. “Habeas corpus relief is unavailable because petitioner’s contention[s] in support of the petition ‘could have been . . . raised on direct appeal or by a motion pursuant to CPL article 440’ ” (People ex rel. Lewis v Graham, 96 AD3d 1423, 1423, lv denied 19 NY3d 813; see People ex rel. Martinez v Graham, 98 AD3d 1312, 1312, lv denied 20 NY3d 853; People ex rel. Lanfair v Corcoran, 60 AD3d 1351, 1351, lv denied 12 NY3d 714).

Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Lanfair v. Corcoran
60 A.D.3d 1351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Lewis v. Graham
96 A.D.3d 1423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People ex rel. Martinez v. Graham
98 A.D.3d 1312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MONTGOMERY, MITCHELL v. ARTUS, DALE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-mitchell-v-artus-dale-nyappdiv-2014.