Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. Riverside Co.
This text of 66 So. 459 (Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. Riverside Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action ivas by appellee against appellant, to recover damages to a wagon and team of [381]*381mules, the result of a collision with one of appellant’s street cars. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant street car company, which verdict was set aside on appellee’s motion; and from the judgment so setting aside the verdict, and awarding a new trial, appellant appeals.
The trial court granted the new trial upon the ground that he had erroneously instructed the jury, at appellant’s request, as to the doctrine of contributory negligence. At best these charges were calculated to mislead the jury, and we will not reverse the court for granting the new trial, if, in his opinion, the charges did so mislead the jury.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 So. 459, 188 Ala. 380, 1914 Ala. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-light-traction-co-v-riverside-co-ala-1914.