Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. Riverside Co.

66 So. 459, 188 Ala. 380, 1914 Ala. LEXIS 296
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 7, 1914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MAYFIELD, J.

This action ivas by appellee against appellant, to recover damages to a wagon and team of [381] mules, the result of a collision with one of appellant’s street cars. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant street car company, which verdict was set aside on appellee’s motion; and from the judgment so setting aside the verdict, and awarding a new trial, appellant appeals.

The trial court granted the new trial upon the ground that he had erroneously instructed the jury, at appellant’s request, as to the doctrine of contributory negligence. At best these charges were calculated to mislead the jury, and we will not reverse the court for granting the new trial, if, in his opinion, the charges did so mislead the jury.

Affirmed.

Anderson, C. J., and McClellan and de Graffenried, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. Riverside Co., 66 So. 459, 188 Ala. 380, 1914 Ala. LEXIS 296 (Ala. 1914).

66 So. 459 (Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. Riverside Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kent v. Willingham
164 So. 2d 500 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)
Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. Scott
26 So. 2d 200 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)
Proctor v. Coffey
149 So. 838 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)