Montgomery General Hospital v. Division of Corrections

27 Ct. Cl. 126
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedAugust 4, 2008
DocketCC-08-0280
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Ct. Cl. 126 (Montgomery General Hospital v. Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery General Hospital v. Division of Corrections, 27 Ct. Cl. 126 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $9,808.98 for the cost of medical services provided to inmates at the Mount Olive Correctional Complex. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim as well as the amount and further states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. v. Dep’t. of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Airkem Sales & Service v. Department of Mental Health
8 Ct. Cl. 180 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Ct. Cl. 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-general-hospital-v-division-of-corrections-wvctcl-2008.