Montford v. Grohman
248 S.E.2d 727, 295 N.C. 551, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1038
This text of 248 S.E.2d 727 (Montford v. Grohman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Montford v. Grohman, 248 S.E.2d 727, 295 N.C. 551, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1038 (N.C. 1978).
Opinion
Mildred MONTFORD
v.
H. G. GROHMAN, in his official capacity as Sheriff of New Hanover, and Beneficial Finance Company of Wilmington.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
James B. Gillespie, Jr., Donald S. Gillespie, Jr., Robert H. Gage, for plaintiff.
*728 Poisson, Barnhill, Butler & Britt, for defendant.
Plaintiff's notice of appeal under G.S. 7A-30, 36 N.C.App. 733, 245 S.E.2d 219. Motion of the defendant to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Montford v. Grohman
245 S.E.2d 219 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 S.E.2d 727, 295 N.C. 551, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montford-v-grohman-nc-1978.