MONTEVECCHI v. State

28 So. 3d 943, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1606, 2010 WL 532825
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 17, 2010
Docket4D09-5367
StatusPublished

This text of 28 So. 3d 943 (MONTEVECCHI v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MONTEVECCHI v. State, 28 So. 3d 943, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1606, 2010 WL 532825 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Forrest v. State, 988 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). This affir-mance is without prejudice as to the filing of an amended motion with a facially sufficient claim pursuant to Forrest.

WARNER, POLEN and CIKLIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forrest v. State
988 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 So. 3d 943, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1606, 2010 WL 532825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montevecchi-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.