Montesinos v. State

77 So. 3d 726, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18178, 2011 WL 5570638
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2011·No. No. 3D11-2687·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

RAMIREZ, J.

We treat Carlos Montesinos’ petition for belated appeal as an appeal from the summary denial of his postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and reverse for a determination on the merits.

After a trial, Montesinos was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. His appeal from the conviction and sentence was affirmed by this Court and the mandate was issued on January 9, 2008. Montesinos v. State, 972 So.2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Thereafter, Montesinos filed a motion for postconviction relief under Rule 3.850, which subsequently he attempted to amend. Within the two-year period, Montesinos requested an extension of time to file the amended motion. However, the trial court denied his request and has not ruled on the amended motion which Montesinos nonetheless filed. Under Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007), Montesinos was entitled to amend his postconviction motion. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to determine the merits of Montesinos’ postconviction motion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montesinos v. State, 77 So. 3d 726, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18178, 2011 WL 5570638 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

77 So. 3d 726 (Montesinos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montesinos v. State
143 So. 3d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)