Montesinos v. Cote

46 A.D.3d 774, 848 N.Y.S.2d 329
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 18, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 46 A.D.3d 774 (Montesinos v. Cote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montesinos v. Cote, 46 A.D.3d 774, 848 N.Y.S.2d 329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered July 28, 2006, which, upon an order of the same court entered May 9, 2006, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Lisa Montesinos (hereinafter the injured plaintiff), allegedly sustained serious injuries when she attempted to exit her vehicle and the driver’s door of her car made contact with the trailer portion of a tractor-trailer owned by the defendant R & L Transfer and operated by the defendant Alan D. Cote, Jr. (hereinafter the defendants).

The evidence which the defendants submitted in support of their motion for summary judgment established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). The evidence established that the injured plaintiff violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1214 by opening the door on the side of her car adjacent to moving traffic when it was not reasonably safe to do so, and was negligent in failing to see what, by the reasonable use of her senses, she should have seen (see Williams v Persaud, 19 AD3d 686 [2005]). The evidence which the plaintiffs submitted in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]). Miller, J.P., Crane, Dillon and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Angelastro v. Dyer
2024 NY Slip Op 04237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Reyes v. United States
S.D. New York, 2021
Rincon v. Renaud
2020 NY Slip Op 05068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Gonzalez v. O Tembelis Trans, Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 3750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Persaud v. Hub Truck Rental Corp.
2019 NY Slip Op 1808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Price v. Tasber
2016 NY Slip Op 8385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Tavarez v. Herrasme
140 A.D.3d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Bonny v. Pierre
91 A.D.3d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Abbas v. Salavel
73 A.D.3d 1100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Saved v. Aviles
72 A.D.3d 1061 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.3d 774, 848 N.Y.S.2d 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montesinos-v-cote-nyappdiv-2007.