MONTESINO v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

MONTESINO v. State

31 So. 3d 918, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4195, 2010 WL 1222780

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 2010

Docket3D09-2084

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 So. 3d 918 (MONTESINO v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MONTESINO v. State, 31 So. 3d 918, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4195, 2010 WL 1222780 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper concession, we reverse the order denying defendant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. This cause is remanded to the trial court to determine whether the defendant was afforded appropriate credit for time served pursuant to Tripp v. State, *919 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993), in the court’s June 2007 order, as delineated in the State’s response.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper concession, we reverse the order denying defendant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. This cause is remanded to the trial court to determine whether the defendant was afforded appropriate credit for time served pursuant to Tripp v. State, *919 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993), in the court’s June 2007 order, as delineated in the State’s response.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 So. 3d 918, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4195, 2010 WL 1222780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montesino-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack