MONTESINO v. State

31 So. 3d 918, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4195, 2010 WL 1222780
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 2010·No. 3D09-2084·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper concession, we reverse the order denying defendant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. This cause is remanded to the trial court to determine whether the defendant was afforded appropriate credit for time served pursuant to Tripp v. State, *919 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993), in the court’s June 2007 order, as delineated in the State’s response.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MONTESINO v. State, 31 So. 3d 918, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4195, 2010 WL 1222780 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

31 So. 3d 918 (MONTESINO v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Capers v. State
31 So. 3d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)