Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Montesino v. State

Montesino v. State

640 So. 2d 1196, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7662, 1994 WL 398354
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 1994
DocketNo. 94-191
StatusPublished

This text of 640 So. 2d 1196 (Montesino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montesino v. State, 640 So. 2d 1196, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7662, 1994 WL 398354 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the sole point directed to the convictions entered below. See Nacher v. State, 465 So.2d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA1985). As the state concedes, however, it was improper to impose consecutive habitual offender sentences for offenses committed in the same criminal episode. See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). Hence, after remand, those sentences shall be made concurrent.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hale v. State
630 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Nacher v. State
465 So. 2d 598 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
640 So. 2d 1196, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7662, 1994 WL 398354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montesino-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.