Montes v. Johnson

New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided February 29, 2012·No. 31,721·Unpublished

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 MARIA L. VARGAS MONTES,

3 Petitioner-Appellee,

4 v. No. 31,721

5 HOWARD JOHNSON,

6 Respondent-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY 8 Daniel Viramontes, District Judge

9 DeLaney & Hernandez, LLC 10 Amy C. DeLaney-Hernandez 11 Deming, NM

12 for Appellee

13 Howard Johnson 14 Deming, NM

15 Pro Se Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,

3 and the time for doing so has expired.

4 Affirmed.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

11 12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 13

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montes v. Johnson, (N.M. Ct. App. 2012).

Montes v. Johnson (Montes v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.