Montes v. Johnson
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 MARIA L. VARGAS MONTES,
3 Petitioner-Appellee,
4 v. No. 31,721
5 HOWARD JOHNSON,
6 Respondent-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY 8 Daniel Viramontes, District Judge
9 DeLaney & Hernandez, LLC 10 Amy C. DeLaney-Hernandez 11 Deming, NM
12 for Appellee
13 Howard Johnson 14 Deming, NM
15 Pro Se Appellant
16 MEMORANDUM OPINION
17 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,
3 and the time for doing so has expired.
4 Affirmed.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
11 12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 13
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Montes v. Johnson (Montes v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.