Monterrosa v. City of Vallejo

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 16, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-01563·Unknown

Opinion

1 JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ., SBN 69888 BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, ESQ. SBN 222173 2 JAMES COOK, ESQ., SBN 300212 3 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Center 4 7677 Oakport St., Suite 1120 Oakland, CA 94621 5 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 6 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 Email: John.Burris@johnburrislaw.com 7 Email: Ben.Nisenbaum@johnburrislaw.com Email: James.Cook@johnburrislaw.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 VERONICA A.F. NEBB 10 City Attorney, SBN 140001 BY: MEERA BHATT 11 Assistant City Attorney, SBN 259203 12 KATELYN M. KNIGHT Assistant City Attorney, SBN 264573 13 FARRAH HUSSEIN Deputy City Attorney, SBN 305726 14 CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall 15 555 Santa Clara Street, 3rd Floor Vallejo, CA 94590 16 Tel: (707) 648-4545 17 Fax: (707) 648-4687 Email: Meera.Bhatt@cityofvallejo.net 18 Katelyn.Knight@cityofvallejo.net Farrah.Hussein@cityofvallejo.net 19 20 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF VALLEJO and JARRETT TONN

21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 22

23 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

24 NEFTALI MONTERROSA, individually and No. 2:20-cv-01563-TLN-DB as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent SEAN 25 MONTERROSA; NORA MONTERROSA, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 26 individually and as co-successor-in-interest to PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE Decedent SEAN MONTERROSA; 141.1 27 MICHELLE MONTERROSA, individually; ASHLEY MONTERROSA, individually, 28 1 Plaintiffs,

2 vs. 3 CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal 4 corporation; JARRETT TONN, individually, and, Vallejo police officers DOES 1-25, 5 inclusive, 6 Defendants. 7

8 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 9 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 10 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 11 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 12 Particularly as this matter arises from an incident that is still under criminal investigation. 13 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following 14 Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 15 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from 16 public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to 17 confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as 18 set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file 19 confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be 20 followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to 21 file material under seal. 22 2. DEFINITIONS 23 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 24 information or items under this Order. 25 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 26 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 27 of Civil Procedure 26(c), and for which public disclosure is likely to result in particularized harm 28 and violate privacy interests recognized by law. This information may include: 1 2 a. files related to the criminal investigation of the incident while the criminal 3 investigation and review and any consequent criminal proceedings are 4 pending; 5 b. personnel file records of any peace officer; 6 c. medical records; 7 d. social security numbers and similar sensitive identifying information 8 (unless redacted by order or by agreement of all parties). 9 This information shall not include records and information subject to disclosure pursuant to Cal. 10 Penal Code § 832.7(b) that have been publicly disclosed. 11 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside counsel of record where applicable and in- 12 house counsel (as well as their support staff). 13 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that 14 it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 15 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 16 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 17 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 18 responses to discovery in this matter. 19 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent 20 to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as 21 a consultant in this action. 22 2.7 In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. In- 23 house counsel does not include outside counsel of record or any other outside counsel. 24 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other 25 legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 26 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 27 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this 28 action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of 1 that party. 2 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 3 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 4 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 5 Material in this action. 6 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 7 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 8 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 9 subcontractors. 10 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 11 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 12 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 13 Producing Party. 14 3. SCOPE 15 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 16 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied from Protected Material; (2) all copies, 17 excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material that reveal the source of the 18 Protected Material or that reveal specific information entitled to confidentiality as a matter of 19 law; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might 20 reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do 21 not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time 22 of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a 23 Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including 24 becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to 25 the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure 26 from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality 27 to the Designating Party. ; (c) any information mentioned or referenced in a deposition or in 28 other pretrial or trial proceedings, unless such portions of testimony have been designated as 1 confidential pursuant to section 5.2 (b) of this order. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall 2 be governed by a separate agreement or order. 3 4. DURATION 4 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 5 this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court 6 order otherwise directs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monterrosa v. City of Vallejo, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Monterrosa v. City of Vallejo (Monterrosa v. City of Vallejo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)