Montero v. United States
This text of 450 F. App'x 946 (Montero v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This pro se appellant, Jose Jaime Montero, seeks refunds of allegedly overpaid taxes of $60 million for 2007 and approximately $1.2 billion for 2008. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed his complaint “for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted.” We affirm.
Although Montero’s complaint is difficult to follow, he apparently contends he made various payments to courts in three states through international bills of exchange. He does not allege, let alone show, that he paid those amounts to the Internal Revenue Service as taxes for those years. Without such payments, the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over a tax refund suit. Shore v. United States, 9 F.3d 1524, 1526 (Fed.Cir.1993). Nor does he state that he filed a claim with the Internal Revenue Service for a refund of those taxes, which filing is a statutory prerequisite for a suit for a tax refund. 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a).
In these circumstances, the Court of Federal Claims properly dismissed his complaint. The judgment of that court is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 F. App'x 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montero-v-united-states-cafc-2010.