Montero v. State

631 So. 2d 369, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 754, 1994 WL 34067
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1994·No. No. 92-3482·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but, based upon the state’s express concession, remand for purposes of deleting any provisions restricting appellant’s entitlement to gain time. We reject appellant’s claim that the trial court’s order did not contemplate that appellant receive credit for his jail term against his community control sentence.

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montero v. State, 631 So. 2d 369, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 754, 1994 WL 34067 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

631 So. 2d 369 (Montero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batts v. STATE, DEPT. OF EDUC.
631 So. 2d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)