Montero v. Muller

269 A.D.2d 576, 704 N.Y.S.2d 507, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2136
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages [577] for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated July 27, 1999, which denied her motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for an assessment of damages.

Under the circumstances of this case, where, inter alia, it is undisputed that the defendant Donald Muller was intoxicated at the time that the motor vehicle he was operating crossed over to the wrong side of the road and struck the plaintiff, there exist no triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]) as to whether that defendant’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montero v. Muller, 269 A.D.2d 576, 704 N.Y.S.2d 507, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 576 (Montero v. Muller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arrowitz v. Arrowitz
279 A.D.2d 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Alami v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
278 A.D.2d 262 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)