Montero Grocery, Inc. v. McLaughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Montero Grocery, Inc. v. McLaughlin

99 A.D.2d 769, 472 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17149

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 769 (Montero Grocery, Inc. v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montero Grocery, Inc. v. McLaughlin, 99 A.D.2d 769, 472 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Liquor Authority, dated December 20,1982, which, after a hearing, suspended petitioner’s retail off-premises beer license for 40 days, with 20 days’ suspension deferred. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination that petitioner permitted alcoholic beverages to be sold and delivered to minors was supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, must not be disturbed (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). We have considered petitioner’s other contentions, and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Weinstein, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Liquor Authority, dated December 20,1982, which, after a hearing, suspended petitioner’s retail off-premises beer license for 40 days, with 20 days’ suspension deferred. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination that petitioner permitted alcoholic beverages to be sold and delivered to minors was supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, must not be disturbed (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). We have considered petitioner’s other contentions, and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Weinstein, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 769, 472 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montero-grocery-inc-v-mclaughlin-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack