Montenegro v. State
This text of 876 So. 2d 709 (Montenegro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Enrique MONTENEGRO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Enrique Montenegro, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, RAMIREZ and SHEPHERD, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Enrique Montenegro appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, following an evidentiary hearing. As the trial courts rulings are supported by competent substantial evidence, we affirm the order denying relief. See Machin v. State, 867 So.2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Williams v. State, 808 So.2d 267, 267 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Butler v. State, 807 So.2d 88, 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), review denied, 828 So.2d 384 (Fla.2002).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
876 So. 2d 709, 2004 WL 1462614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montenegro-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.