Montemayor v. Patterson UTI Drilling
This text of Montemayor v. Patterson UTI Drilling (Montemayor v. Patterson UTI Drilling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT: COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION STEVE MONTEMAYOR, Plaintiff, v. | No. 6:24-CV-037-H-BU PATTERSON UTI DRILLING, et al., Defendants. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 10. No objections were filed. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error. Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 975 F.3d 488, 502 (Sth Cir. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. So ordered on July 7A 2024.
va HENDRIX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Montemayor v. Patterson UTI Drilling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montemayor-v-patterson-uti-drilling-txnd-2024.