Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
This text of 141 F.4th 1334 (Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLAUDIA ELENA MONTEJO- No. 21-304 GONZALEZ; DANY JUAN FRANCISCO Agency Nos. MONTEJO; MARIA NATALIA A201-670-355 FRANCISCO MONTEJO, A201-670-354 A201-670-353 Petitioners,
v. ORDER
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)
and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 F.4th 1334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montejo-gonzalez-v-bondi-ca9-2025.