Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi

141 F.4th 1334
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 8, 2025·No. 21-304·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLAUDIA ELENA MONTEJO- No. 21-304 GONZALEZ; DANY JUAN FRANCISCO Agency Nos. MONTEJO; MARIA NATALIA A201-670-355 FRANCISCO MONTEJO, A201-670-354 A201-670-353 Petitioners,

v. ORDER

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)

and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi, 141 F.4th 1334 (9th Cir. 2025).

141 F.4th 1334 (Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
Ninth Circuit, 2026