Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi

141 F.4th 1334
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 2025
Docket21-304
StatusPublished

This text of 141 F.4th 1334 (Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi, 141 F.4th 1334 (9th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLAUDIA ELENA MONTEJO- No. 21-304 GONZALEZ; DANY JUAN FRANCISCO Agency Nos. MONTEJO; MARIA NATALIA A201-670-355 FRANCISCO MONTEJO, A201-670-354 A201-670-353 Petitioners,

v. ORDER

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)

and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
Ninth Circuit, 2026

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 F.4th 1334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montejo-gonzalez-v-bondi-ca9-2025.