Montecarbole v. Mundel

16 How. Pr. 141
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1858
StatusPublished

This text of 16 How. Pr. 141 (Montecarbole v. Mundel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montecarbole v. Mundel, 16 How. Pr. 141 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1858).

Opinion

Mitchell, Justice.

The plaintiff should have tendered his reply with the $10 costs, at least before he noticed the cause for trial. Instead of that, he went to the circuit with the plead[142]*142ings ready for trial, but without a reply, and the reply is since drawn and sworn to. He is in default, and should now pay the costs of the present circuit—the $10 before ordered, and the costs of the present motion, $10—and serve his reply in three days from notice of this order, and the adjustment of the costs. The cause may there remain on the calendar, but not to be tried at this circuit, without the consent of the defendant. Defendant may have leave to apply to postpone the trial still further. If he chooses to move to that effect, let the defendant enter and serve notice of the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 How. Pr. 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montecarbole-v-mundel-nysupct-1858.