Montebello v. Murdock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Montebello v. Murdock

7 A.D.2d 736, 181 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3981

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 736 (Montebello v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montebello v. Murdock, 7 A.D.2d 736, 181 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York which granted an application under subdivisions (e) and (i) of section 7 of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York for a variance to permit the erection and operation of a gasoline service station and accessory uses, in a restricted retail use district, for a period of 15 years, subject to conditions and safeguards imposed by the board. The appeal is from an order vacating, on respondents’ motion, an order of certiorari, dismissing the petition and confirming the determination. Order [737]*737unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York which granted an application under subdivisions (e) and (i) of section 7 of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York for a variance to permit the erection and operation of a gasoline service station and accessory uses, in a restricted retail use district, for a period of 15 years, subject to conditions and safeguards imposed by the board. The appeal is from an order vacating, on respondents’ motion, an order of certiorari, dismissing the petition and confirming the determination. Order [737]*737unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 736, 181 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montebello-v-murdock-nyappdiv-1958.