Monte v. Cypress Bend Condominium VII Ass'n

77 So. 3d 920, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 980, 2012 WL 204470
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 2012·No. No. 4D10-5128·Published

Opinion

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Frank M. Monte, III, timely appeals the trial court’s final judgment of foreclosure on the grounds that he was never served with process. Monte never obtained a ruling from the trial court on his claim that service was improper. See Johnston v. Hudlett, 32 So.3d 700, 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Absent a ruling from the trial court and accompanying record evidence to support Monte’s contention, this Court has no ability to review Monte’s claim. Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment without prejudice for Monte to seek to set aside the final judgment. See H & F Tires, L.P. v. D. Gladis Co., 981 So.2d 647, 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“ ‘[A] judgment entered without service of process on the defendant is void and may be attacked at any time.’ ”) (quoting M.L. Builders, Inc. v. [921]*921Reserve Developers, LLP, 769 So.2d 1079, 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)).

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., and HAZOURI, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monte v. Cypress Bend Condominium VII Ass'n, 77 So. 3d 920, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 980, 2012 WL 204470 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

77 So. 3d 920 (Monte v. Cypress Bend Condominium VII Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

H & F TIRES, LP v. D. Gladis Co., Inc.
981 So. 2d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Johnston v. HUDLETT
32 So. 3d 700 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
ML Builders, Inc. v. Reserve Developers, LLP
769 So. 2d 1079 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)