Monte v. Cypress Bend Condominium VII Ass'n
This text of 77 So. 3d 920 (Monte v. Cypress Bend Condominium VII Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Frank M. Monte, III, timely appeals the trial court’s final judgment of foreclosure on the grounds that he was never served with process. Monte never obtained a ruling from the trial court on his claim that service was improper. See Johnston v. Hudlett, 32 So.3d 700, 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Absent a ruling from the trial court and accompanying record evidence to support Monte’s contention, this Court has no ability to review Monte’s claim. Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment without prejudice for Monte to seek to set aside the final judgment. See H & F Tires, L.P. v. D. Gladis Co., 981 So.2d 647, 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“ ‘[A] judgment entered without service of process on the defendant is void and may be attacked at any time.’ ”) (quoting M.L. Builders, Inc. v. [921]*921Reserve Developers, LLP, 769 So.2d 1079, 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 So. 3d 920, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 980, 2012 WL 204470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monte-v-cypress-bend-condominium-vii-assn-fladistctapp-2012.