Montclair Trust Co. v. the Star Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Montclair Trust Co. v. the Star Co.

57 A.2d 7, 141 N.J. Eq. 263, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 612

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJanuary 29, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 A.2d 7 (Montclair Trust Co. v. the Star Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montclair Trust Co. v. the Star Co., 57 A.2d 7, 141 N.J. Eq. 263, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 612 (N.J. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was orally argued with No. 214, October term, 1949, The Star Co. v. Montclair Trust Co. Our consideration thereof and of the proofs and briefs, leads us to conclude that the decree of the court beluvy was proper in the following particulars, and we affrm the decree in so far as it dismissed appellant’s counter-claim, determined that there was due and owing to complainant the sum of $97,214.10, directed a special master to make sale of the remaining assets, and the distribution to be made of the proceeds.

The decree is faulty and should be amended in the following particulars: The property to be sold is not set out, but is described in schedules annexed; the recitals attempt to effectuate several negative adjudications against appellant as to precise questions put in issue and on which it was unsuccessful; it contains recitals of the pleadings and the matter contained should be more succinctly stated. Bull v. International Power Co., 84 N. J. Eq. 209; affirmed, 85 N. J. Eq. 206; Beall v. New York and New Jersey Water Co., 87 N. J. Eq. 390; N. J. S. A. 2:29-52.

The record will be remanded to the Court of Chancery for disposition consistent herewith.

For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill,-Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case was orally argued with No. 214, October term, 1949, The Star Co. v. Montclair Trust Co. Our consideration thereof and of the proofs and briefs, leads us to conclude that the decree of the court beluvy was proper in the following particulars, and we affrm the decree in so far as it dismissed appellant’s counter-claim, determined that there was due and owing to complainant the sum of $97,214.10, directed a special master to make sale of the remaining assets, and the distribution to be made of the proceeds.

The decree is faulty and should be amended in the following particulars: The property to be sold is not set out, but is described in schedules annexed; the recitals attempt to effectuate several negative adjudications against appellant as to precise questions put in issue and on which it was unsuccessful; it contains recitals of the pleadings and the matter contained should be more succinctly stated. Bull v. International Power Co., 84 N. J. Eq. 209; affirmed, 85 N. J. Eq. 206; Beall v. New York and New Jersey Water Co., 87 N. J. Eq. 390; N. J. S. A. 2:29-52.

The record will be remanded to the Court of Chancery for disposition consistent herewith.

For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill,-Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.2d 7, 141 N.J. Eq. 263, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montclair-trust-co-v-the-star-co-nj-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack