Montant v. Johnson
This text of 99 N.Y.S. 395 (Montant v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think the judgment appealed from should be reversed. The evidence shows clearly that there was a sale of the dog to the plaintiff, and that there was a delivery. After the delivery of the dog, it was intrusted to the care of the vendor for a day. She then had no right to sell it to the defendant. It was plaintiff’s property, although the price had not been paid. The defendant evidently knew all of the circumstances of the sale to the plaintiff, and took the dog with notice of plaintiff’s title. The dog should be given to the plaintiff.
The judgment is reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 N.Y.S. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montant-v-johnson-nyappterm-1906.