Montano v. United States
This text of Montano v. United States (Montano v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 25-1973 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 12/11/2025
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
JOSE A. MONTANO, on behalf of Montano Electri- cal Contractor, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2025-1973 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:25-cv-00700-AOB, Judge Armando O. Bonilla. ______________________
Before PROST, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER The United States Court of Federal Claims dismissed Jose A. Montano’s complaint and entered judgment on May 8, 2025. The Court of Federal Claims received Mr. Mon- tano’s notice of appeal 61 days later on July 8, 2025. This court directed the parties to show cause whether the appeal should be dismissed as untimely. The United States moves for leave to respond to the show cause out of time, ECF No. 7-1, and urges dismissal in its proposed response, Case: 25-1973 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 12/11/2025
ECF No. 7-2. Mr. Montano did not respond to the court’s show cause order. We now dismiss. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be received by the Court of Federal Claims within 60 days of the entry of the final judgment. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2107(b), 2522; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C). This statutory deadline is mandatory and jurisdictional, such that we may not ex- cuse a late notice. Marandola v. United States, 518 F.3d 913, 914 (Fed. Cir. 2008); see also Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 438–39 (2011); cf. Fed. R. App. P. 26(b)(1). Because the notice of appeal was not received within that time, we lack jurisdiction and must dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) ECF No. 7-1 is granted, and ECF No. 7-2 is ac- cepted for filing. (2) The appeal is dismissed. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT
December 11, 2025 Date
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Montano v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montano-v-united-states-cafc-2025.